Tokenfi
Tokenfi token launcher - ERC-20 tokens and NFT collections
Tokenfi token launcher creates EVM token contracts without requiring users to write code, with ERC-20, ERC-721, and ERC-1155 options for different ownership structures. The choices cover interchangeable tokens, individually identified NFTs, and multi-token collections. Optional transfer features and collection minting permissions determine how a particular contract behaves. Exchange trading and fundraising involve additional arrangements beyond contract creation, so the right configuration follows the token's intended use.
ERC-20 balances, ERC-721 NFTs, and ERC-1155 collections
The token standard determines how the contract represents ownership, so the choice starts with the kind of units the project needs to issue.
Interchangeable token balances
ERC-20 represents fungible balances: units of the same token are interchangeable. This suits a project whose ownership records need quantities rather than separate item identities. The launcher supports a basic token without special functionality, alongside configurations with additional transaction behavior. Selecting ERC-20 does not require enabling every available fee or redistribution feature. Those additions belong to the selected implementation, beyond the standard's basic balance and transfer interface.
Distinct NFTs and multiple token types
ERC-721 identifies each NFT separately, with ownership attached to a token ID. ERC-1155 permits several token types within one contract, including types with multiple interchangeable copies. That flexibility belongs to the underlying standard; the launcher's collection settings determine the configuration being created. Collection structure follows the ownership requirements, including whether copies share a type or each item needs a separate identity.
From token settings to contract deployment
A project that wants transfers without an added token-level charge can choose a basic ERC-20 configuration. Enabling a transaction fee adds the configured charge to later token transactions. The deployment budget covers a separate payment for creation and network execution. The reviewed settings need to match the intended transfers before the creator commits funds to the deployment.
| Token creation stage | Required inputs and access |
|---|---|
| Connect a wallet and choose the token type | A wallet for a supported network and a decision about the ownership structure. |
| Enter basic details and optional features | The token's required properties and any applicable transfer-fee settings. |
| Review the token and choose a payment method | Complete token settings and an available creation-payment option. |
| Authorize the creation transaction and deploy | Access to the signing wallet and funds for the required transaction costs. |
Successful deployment on the selected network establishes the new contract. A signed request alone does not prove that the network executed it.
Optional transfer charges and token behavior
Optional transaction features determine whether the token charges for transfers or directs fees toward another function. These choices concern the new token's behavior after deployment.
Transaction fees and burns
A transaction-fee configuration adds a charge to the token's transactions. A burn feature uses part of the configured fees to remove tokens from supply. The relevant rate and allocation belong to that individual token; the ERC-20 standard does not prescribe a universal transaction tax. Descriptions of the token should therefore explain the enabled charge and what its allocation does, keeping the transfer mechanism distinct from the initial creation payment.
Holder reflections and buyback liquidity
Reflection features distribute additional tokens to holders through the configured mechanism. Buyback liquidity directs a portion of fees toward purchasing tokens and improving liquidity. Neither feature follows automatically from having an ERC-20 balance, and their presence should follow the configuration of the particular token.
How much does creating a token cost?
The deployment total depends on the creation payment and the network fee for the transaction that creates the token. An optional charge on the new token's later transactions is a different expense. On Ethereum, gas measures execution work, and ETH pays the network fee. Changes in network demand can change that expense without changing the token's name or standard.
Liquidity funding is another budget item when exchange trading forms part of the launch. It supplies assets to a pool rather than paying for token creation.
Public minting and collection permissions
An NFT collection's minting policy determines who may create new items, while a public mint charge determines what the project receives from that activity.
Public access or administrator wallets
The collection settings allow public minting or restrict it to administrator wallets. Public access lets external wallets participate in creating items under the collection's rules. Administrator-only minting keeps that permission with designated wallets. This setting concerns the creation of new NFTs; ownership and transfers of existing NFTs remain separate operations.
Charges paid to the project treasury
A configured public mint fee goes to the project's treasury. It differs from deploying the collection contract and from a later marketplace sale price.
Supported EVM networks and wallet access
Network choice determines where the token contract exists and where the creator must authorize its deployment. Mainnet support includes Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base, Arbitrum, Blast, and opBNB. These networks share EVM compatibility, while their balances and deployment transactions remain network-specific. A wallet connected to one network does not make assets on another network available for that deployment. The relevant wallet needs access to the chosen chain and the funds required there.
What does the CertiK audit cover?
The launcher's CertiK audit claim concerns its token-creation smart contracts. Tokens created using that implementation benefit from the review of its underlying code. The default-audited description relates to those contracts. It does not establish a separate assessment of each project's finances, artwork, or management, which fall outside that contract-review claim.
Contract auditing also differs from choosing settings that fit a project's stated terms. An audited implementation can execute a transfer fee exactly as configured. Whether that charge suits the token's intended use remains a design decision. Audit coverage must stay attached to the code that the auditor reviewed; it cannot automatically extend to unrelated contracts added to a project.
Liquidity pools and a token's trading market
A decentralized exchange pool provides a route for trading a fungible token after creation. The launcher includes liquidity setup options for decentralized exchanges. Creating the contract and providing pool assets serve different purposes: the contract establishes token behavior, while a pool supplies trading liquidity. The amount of the project token allocated to liquidity is therefore a separate project decision.
Liquidity setup also differs from a fundraising sale. A pool permits swaps against its available assets, while a sale raises funds under its own terms. Contract existence alone does not establish market depth. A launch plan that includes exchange trading needs to account for the pool's available liquidity alongside the token's transfer behavior.
Browser creation, QuickLaunch, and fundraising
The browser launcher provides a web interface for configuring and creating token contracts. QuickLaunch Bot offers token creation through Telegram and Discord. Launchpad handles decentralized token fundraising, which is a different task from issuing the contract. When a project needs permissioned issuance tied to a real-world asset, the RWA Tokenization Module addresses investor qualification and transfer controls. A project with a defined token design can then decide whether its remaining requirement concerns fundraising, trading liquidity, or controlled participation in an asset offering.
Helpful answers about Tokenfi token launcher
-
How long does a launcher deployment take after wallet approval?
- Deployment finishes when the creation transaction executes successfully on the selected network. Wallet approval authorizes the transaction and does not establish its inclusion or success. Network demand and the transaction's fee settings can affect processing, so a short token-creation estimate cannot promise a completion time for every deployment.
-
Which details become public when I deploy a token?
- Deployment on a public EVM network exposes the transaction and the contract's public on-chain data. The sending wallet address and transaction input data form part of the network record. Material written into those fields should be treated as public, even when the creation interface resembles an ordinary web form. Confidential information does not belong in public token data.
-
Does TOKEN's transfer tax apply to every launcher-created token?
- TOKEN's own tokenomics do not define the transfer fees of every token created with the launcher. TOKEN is the platform's utility token; a newly issued token has the contract features selected for that project.
-
Can launcher-created NFTs be traded on OpenSea?
- Launcher-created ERC-721 and ERC-1155 collections can trade on OpenSea where the marketplace supports their network and format. That compatibility does not create a sale or a buyer by itself.
-
Will enabling a burn feature automatically increase my token's price?
- A burn feature reduces token supply under its configured rules; it does not set a market price. Token demand and available trading liquidity remain separate factors.